Tópico: Teorias pseudocientíficas engraçadas

[Buckaroo Banzai]

Gender division in two opposites is grave mistake
Postby mugdha » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:02 am

I could not put it down not because I like it But it was something strange .Never read anything like it before, .......
’Scientists have somehow missed definitions of gender in human beings,” states Dr. Makarand Fulzele. Insights gained from years of practice as surgeon makes him wonder if indeed we have overlooked facts staring in our face. Nature has a tendency to hide many secrets but at the same time it provides enough clues to unravel its mysteries. Dr. Fulzele picks up loose threads from life to stitch together the theory that man is an extension of woman in his new book, “Man Is the Extension of Woman: Know the Ultimate Truth about Yourself” (published by iUniverse). Dr. Fulzele’s book explores similarities between men and women against the backdrop of their genetic differences, physical variations, and emotional and intellectual dissimilarities. Dr. Fulzele who is a successful surgeon further explains in his book: The main hypothesis I discuss in this book is that, if a woman lives long enough she will be converted into a man physically. A similar thing can also be stated about man. It is wrong to categorize humankind into two genders as it implicates that they are extremely dissimilar and physically opposite to each other. I try to prove that man and woman are just two different stages of one developmental process. And physically they are very similar. The ideas presented may sound unconventional but Dr. Fulzele implores readers to consider his point of view with an open mind. “Your world will not change if you do not agree with me. But if you agree with me, how does it change your world? If more people agree with you and me, how does it change our world? The possibilities are limitless.”
What intrigued me was this equation
But look at the man. He is something more. He is X and Y. That means, he is essentially an ‘X ’plus something extra. What do I mean by that! Man is already a woman that is ‘X’, plus something extra. Does that mean first step towards manhood is womanhood? Now let’s talk in mathematical language. Here is the equation, Man = 22 autosomes + X + Y Woman= 22 autosomes + X + X= 22 autsomes + X (by logic not by mathematics). . . Man= (22 autosomes + X) + Y= Woman + Y (by mathematics, simply) So man is everything that woman is, plus something extra. Now the extra thing is not qualitatively different, but quantitatively. Hence Y here must be somewhat like X + 1, X+2 or X+ 3 or something like that. It would be ultimately proven that woman can potentially grow into man. Similarly man can reduce to woman, if he loses some part of ‘Y’.

[3libras]

a diferença é que o XX vai acabar gerando alguns fatores que o X isolado não gera, vide sindrome de turner.

da mesma forma que XXX gera fatores diferentes.

[Vento Sul]

E quanto cada um tem do macaco? 

 XY pode ser X+Y, mas X pode ser  XY-Y, isto é parte do xy sem o y...  (é da costela mesmo  )

[Eremita]

Queria ver esse povo tentando explicar fungos com três gêneros.

[NandoR]

E quanto cada um tem do macaco? 

 XY pode ser X+Y, mas X pode ser  XY-Y, isto é parte do xy sem o y...  (é da costela mesmo  )