0 Membros e 1 Visitante estão vendo este tópico.
Hutton Gibson: Dear Mr. Sungenis,So you postulate aether to give a "physical explanation" to gravity? Who needs a physical explanation? Aether, even if it exists, fails to accomplish your purpose. Nor is it necessary to the argument that either of us understand gravity merely because we fight it by every upward or lateral movement from the moment we try to arise from bed each day.R. Sungenis: Who needs a physical explanation to gravity?? People like you who keep assuming things about gravity that you can't explain. For example, could you please explain to us, on a physical basis, how it is that gravity reacts instantaneously over very long distances (billion of miles), yet light takes 8.5 minutes to reach from the sun to earth? Don't you think that if someone is going to postulate that gravity seems to work like magic that they better have a physical explanation of its performance? You have explanations for the seasons, the retrograde motion of Mars, the Foucault pendulum, and many other things that people of your persuasion use in an attempt to disprove geocentrism, but somehow you don't have an explanation of gravity - the very explanation that is needed to substantiate every other proof that you postulate for heliocentrism. I find that rather remarkable. And what is even more remarkable is that you don't even care whether you find an explanation or not.
Edit: Agora se aparecer alguem dizendo que a terra é plana, desisto da raça humana.
Citação de: Felius em 14 de Abril de 2006, 23:13:01Edit: Agora se aparecer alguem dizendo que a terra é plana, desisto da raça humana.Não é atoa q ainda não encontravam vida inteligente em nenhu lugar do universo!