I have read the whole article. In the fragment - if there was the "political will" to issue compulsory licences, explains Willian Amaral, president of the Rio-based Grupo Pela Vidda, an AIDS support group. Instead, he says, the country is scared to take on Big Pharma and risk angering countries in the developed world and losing trade opportunities - I can neither understand how issuing compulsory licenses of 'big-brand' drugs would not anger countries in the developed world nor how it would grant trade opportunities, except by selling these drugs to other countries.